"A failed example is not an embarrassment; it is a coordinate system for improvement."
Overview
Error analysis turns aggregate scores into failure structure; ablations test which component actually caused an improvement.
The chapter treats evaluation as a mathematical object: a controlled protocol that maps model behavior into evidence with uncertainty. A result is not just a number; it is an estimate produced by a task distribution, a scoring rule, and an aggregation rule.
This section is written in LaTeX Markdown. Inline mathematics uses $...$, and display
equations use `
`. The emphasis is practical but rigorous: every metric should be linked to the statistical assumptions that make it meaningful.
Prerequisites
- Descriptive Statistics
- Hypothesis Testing
- Regression Analysis
- Capability Benchmarks
- Robustness and Distribution Shift
Companion Notebooks
| Notebook | Description |
|---|---|
| theory.ipynb | Executable demonstrations for error analysis and ablations |
| exercises.ipynb | Graded practice for error analysis and ablations |
Learning Objectives
After completing this section, you will be able to:
- Define the core objects used in error analysis and ablations
- Write empirical estimators for model scores and risks
- Attach uncertainty statements to finite evaluation results
- Separate protocol design from metric computation
- Identify common leakage, sampling, and aggregation failures
- Use synthetic experiments to test statistical intuitions
- Connect offline metrics to downstream AI decisions
- Explain where this section ends and where adjacent chapters begin
- Design exercises and notebooks that make the math executable
- Read modern LLM evaluation papers with sharper statistical judgment
Study Flow
- Read the pages in order and pause after each page to restate the main definition or theorem.
- Run
theory.ipynbwhen you want to check the formulas numerically. - Use
exercises.ipynbafter the reading path, not before it. - Return to this overview page when you need the chapter-level navigation.